The
United States Congress has recognized the frequent use of abusive, deceptive,
and unfair practices by many debt collectors, which cause many consumers to lose
jobs and suffer invasions of privacy. As a result, the Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act was enacted into federal law in order to protect consumers from
these practices.
The Act regulates the conduct of debt collectors in various ways,
including the manner in which they can communicate with the consumer, the
restrictions on communicating with third persons regarding the consumer's debt,
and the penalties for violating the law.
Communicating with the
Consumer
Communicating with Third
Parties
Notice of the Debt
Penalties for Violating the
Act
The Act has placed numerous restrictions on the attempts
by debt collectors to communicate with consumer debtors:
TIME AND
PLACE —
A debt
collector may not communicate with a consumer regarding collection of a debt at
any unusual time or place which the collector should know is inconvenient to the
consumer. Inconvenient times are presumed to be before 8:00 a.m. and after
9:00 p.m.
TYPE OF
CONDUCT — Among the actions prohibited by the Act, collectors may not:
-
Engage in harassment,
oppressive or abusive conduct in an attempt to collect a debt. For instance,
collectors cannot use or threaten the use of violence, or use obscene or
profane language;
-
Cause a telephone to
ring or engage any person in telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously
with intent to annoy, abuse, or harass that person;
-
Publish a list of
consumers who allegedly refuse to pay debts, except to a consumer reporting
agency; or
-
Use false, deceptive,
or misleading representations in an attempt to collect a debt, including
misrepresenting the amount or legal status of a debt, the representation or
implication that the collector is an attorney, the threat to take any action
that is not intended or cannot legally be taken, the representation that
nonpayment of any debt will result in arrest or imprisonment, or the false
representation or implication that the consumer committed any crime.
TERMINATING
COMMUNICATION -A debt collector must cease communicating with a debtor once
the consumer notifies the collector in writing that the consumer refuses to pay
a debt or that the consumer wishes the debt collector to cease further
communications. After such written notice, the collector may advise the consumer
that further communication is being terminated, or that the creditor intends to
invoke a specific remedy. In addition, the debt collector must communicate with
the consumer's attorney rather than the consumer, if the collector knows that an
attorney is representing the consumer.
Debt
collectors attempting to obtain information about the consumer from another
person must identify themselves, state that they are confirming or correcting
location information concerning the consumer, and if requested, must state the
name of their employer. They may not:
-
Communicate more than once with that person, unless
they reasonably believe that the earlier response was incorrect and that the
person now has correct or complete location information;
-
Communicate by post card; or
-
Indicate by
mail or telegram that the debt collector is in the collection business or that
the communication relates to the collection of a debt.
A debt collector must inform the consumer of the amount of the debt and
the name of the creditor. The notice must also advise that unless the consumer
disputes the debt within 30 days, the debt will be assumed to be valid by the
collector, and that if the consumer disputes the debt within that time period,
the creditor will verify the debt and forward that verification to the consumer.
If all this information is not provided by the collector in the initial
communication with the consumer, the collector must notify the consumer of these
points in writing within five days after the first communication.
A debt
collector who violates the Act may be held liable to the consumer for the actual
damages sustained by the consumer, and up to $1,000.00 additional damages to an
individual consumer, as well as the costs of the action, including the
consumer's reasonable attorney's fees. The court determining liability must
consider several factors, including the persistence of the violations by the
debt collector and whether the violation was intentional. It should be noted
that where an action is brought by a consumer against a debt collector in bad
faith or for harassment purposes, the court may award court costs, including
reasonable attorney's fees, to the collector.
Finally,
the Act provides that it is not intended to relieve any person from liability
under stricter debt collection laws adopted by any individual states.
|